G’Kar: “We live for The One, we die for The One.” Interesting that you put all the emphasis on the second half of that sentence.
This quote comes from a scene in the movie “The Legend of the Rangers: To Live and Die by Starlight”. G’kar makes these statements during discussions about a Ranger who chose to retreat in the face of overwhelming odds instead of foolishly sacrificing his crew in a meaningless gesture. The Ranger leadership were of the opinion that the Ranger should have fought to the bitter end because their coda emphasizes a willingness to sacrifice their lives for the protection of others.
G’kar politely reminds them that there are two parts to their oath and that the leadership is focusing too strongly on the latter half. In point, G’kar is reminding them that by living, the Ranger in question may be of more value than if he had died out of an over zealous sense of honor.
Second Amendment to the United States Constitution: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Well, I thought it might be interesting to look at another oft used quote where many people over emphasize one part in conversations. G’kar would probably point out that we were only focusing on the part about infringing upon our right to bear arms in our public discourse. Very little mention is made, in arguments, about the fact such ownership is pursuant upon a Well Regulated Militia. In other words, citizens have a right to bear arms as part of a well regulated militia to be called upon in times of need to defend the country, not as a right to create personal arsenals to rival that of the local police forces or military bases. Not as a catch-all Amendment for ownership and use of any and all firearms, including military grade weapons.
Now, before any Gun advocates blast me for daring to twist the meaning of the second Amendment, let’s consider why the founding fathers may have phrased the Amendment this way. When the Constitution was created, the country was still in infancy. The structures for creating and maintaining a regular army were not agreed upon yet as to the methods and strength so the militia were a vital part of the national defense. However, especially at the time of our countries birth, there could be a threat to the government by these very same forces if they were allowed to become too strong, since not everyone was happy about the change in government from the Revolution. America still had to prove itself worthy. Basically, the founding fathers chose to ensure the continuation of the militia system through the right to bear arms but left themselves room to regulate the collecting of arms with respect to the maintenance of the militia. They did this against the possibility of coups and civil war. Unfortunately we did not avoid the latter but the former never happened. Of course, living in an America as divisively split by the forces of intolerance, greed, and pride, where Politicians promote the use of “Second Amendment Remedies”, the chances of a coup seem much more likely.
So please think about the wisdom of G’kar when you talk about or spout off your thoughts on the Second Amendment.